Learn why steady buzzwords like “ghost growth,” “zombie projects,” “workshop” and “brain rot” are trending in workplaces across America.
getty
New workplace buzzwords are spreading in offices across the country: ghost rise, zombie project And AI Workshop. The new terminology sounds like Internet slang, but it is not. It’s a clinical language for hollow productivity, describing a modern paradox for high activity, low momentum. It shows a depth CThe problem is employees in organizations are busier than ever, yet unsure whether their work really matters.
empty productivity jargon
Zombie projects are initiatives that absorb time, meetings, and budget. Despite lackluster results, they never deliver value yet refuse to die, often due to sunk costs, politics or leadership hesitation. Ghostly growth is the career equivalent: the illusion of advancement with greater responsibility with a lack of real compensation or skill development. AI Workshop Refers to low-quality, AI-generated output that someone else must quietly fix.
Individually, each trend seems manageable. Together, they indicate something more troubling – the rise of hollow productivity, work that looks productive on the surface but lacks momentum, meaning or measurable impact.
Language moves fastest when people struggle to explain what they are experiencing. These root words serve as coping tools and early warning signals. Think of that project that never launches, that initiative that keeps growing, or the AI-generated output that someone quietly fixes after hours. These “undead” tasks don’t just clutter to-do lists. Research and leadership experts say they are killing morale, productivity and innovation.
Piera Gelardi, co-founder of Refinery29 and author of playful wayCall them “the poetry of the walking dead” – to illustrate a deep cultural shift in how work feels today.
Gelardi told me, “Workplaces have become so soul-crushing that we need an entire vocabulary to describe the different flavors of meaninglessness.” “These words go beyond linguistic trends, they signal a cultural SOS. We are killing the conditions that allow creativity to exist and people are dying inside as a result.”
Hollow Productivity: Zombie Projects That Won’t Finish
Zombie projects thrive in ambiguity. Nobody wants to accept failure. No one wants to waste sunk costs. The initiative therefore remains in phase two, pilot mode or continuous revision.
Joe Galvin, Chief Research Officer SceneSays these projects destroy culture slowly but steadily. “They silently sap focus, motivation, and productivity,” says Galvin. “When teams get bogged down in initiatives that never get accomplished, frustration builds. Over time, this contributes to burnout and discourages initiative.”
According to Galvin, zombie projects are silent productivity killers. The damage is subtle. Meetings are increasing. Updates are broadcast. Dashboards shine. But the customer impact stops there. Gallup research consistently shows that clarity of expectations strongly predicts performance.
When priorities become blurred, engagement decreases and stress increases. The illusion becomes a productivity tax. Killing something that’s not working often creates more value than starting something new.
Hollow Productivity: Ghost Growth and Illusion
If zombies destroy organizations, then evolution destroys people. Employees who experience ghost raises do not disengage. They’re overloaded, overworked—leading projects, mentoring colleagues, absorbing responsibilities—yet their title, compensation, and trajectory remain unchanged.
Over time, that mismatch destroys motivation. LinkedIn Workplace research shows that career development opportunities strongly influence retention and performance. When advancement seems demonstrative rather than genuine, high performers start looking for a way out. And stagnation, especially among top talent, is costly.
Hollow productivity: AI workshops are adding more labor
Artificial intelligence was expected to accelerate productivity. But in many workplaces, it has introduced a new layer of invisible work. Zetys Rise of Workshop Report found that two-thirds of employees spend up to six hours a week fixing low-quality AI-generated output that requires human correction. About half of people say they fix errors themselves rather than escalate them.
Zeti career expert Jasmine Escalera says this hidden workload rarely shows up in performance metrics. “Employees are quietly fixing mistakes to keep things running,” she says. “Over time, that extra, unfamiliar work increases exhaustion and isolation.”
Widespread organizational risk isn’t just a waste of time. Employees cite reputational damage, misinformation risks and falling quality standards as emerging concerns.
Cleanliness rarely appears in job descriptions or performance reviews. The irony is: A tool designed to reduce friction often shifts quality control to employees. Harvard Business Review notes that early AI adoption often speeds up coordination, oversight, and review rather than eliminating labor altogether.
brain rot Informal label employees use to describe cognitive overload, where meetings and messages stretch into mornings, evenings, and weekends. Intensive focus, the prerequisite for innovation, is becoming increasingly rare. And there comes the constant notifications and shallow engagement.
When speed becomes the default performance metric, standards are quietly destroyed. Employees bear the burden of improvement. Stress accumulates. Burnout is like this.
How employees can spot low productivity
While leaders shape the system, employees continue to monitor the workplace today while taking actionable steps:
1. Clearly define actual progress. If you can’t clearly articulate how a project builds skills, visibility, or measurable results, it may be ghost development. Link projects to measurable outcomes – skills acquired, revenue impact or strategic visibility.
2. Track energy return on investment. Work that continually saps enthusiasm without producing meaningful results deserves scrutiny. If a project consistently drains inspiration or creativity, reevaluate its value.
3. Schedule regular reality checks. Speed alone is not a justification for continuity. Ask: “Would I start this today knowing what I know now?” If the answer is no, explore recalibration or exit.
4. Look for external validation. Independent feedback prevents internal echo chambers. Advisors, market benchmarks and objective metrics reduce the risk of internal echo chambers.
5. Preserve opportunity bandwidth. Those professionals who cut back on commitments intentionally reserve their bandwidth for high-impact opportunities.
6. Normalize strategic exits. Over-commitment keeps low-value projects alive. Killing a misdirected initiative may reflect judgment, not failure. Diplomatic exit often involves reframing around organizational impact, presenting data neutrally, and offering transition plans.
How leaders can reverse hollow productivity
Gelardi explains that the opposite of hollow productivity is not “productivity” or “efficiency” – it is liveliness. “These language tendencies exist in the workplace because we have created systems that actively punish the messy, non-linear, gloriously inefficient process of human creativity in service of the appearance of efficiency. The output may be large, but there is an abundance of carelessness,” she insists. “And now we are surprised that everything seems to have rotted away?”
“Stopping what isn’t working frees up resources, energy, and creativity for initiatives that really matter,” Galvin explains. “Confronting them face-to-face re-energizes teams, restores focus and increases engagement in work that really moves the needle. Leaders can reverse sagging productivity, but it requires disciplined action rather than motivation like following.
He explains that preventing hollow productivity requires regular auditing of initiatives, setting clear goals and deadlines, and empowering teams to pursue projects or retire them altogether.
A final conclusion on hollow productivity
The emergence of ghost growth, zombie projects, and AI workshops isn’t just a linguistic trend. This is a sign. Ultimately, empty platitudes are less about language and more about leadership. Employees are indicating misalignment between effort and impact, speed and quality, and innovation and bureaucracy.
Progress ultimately belongs to organizations that are willing to trade comfortable busyness for clarity, courage, focus, and meaningful forward progress. Organizations that listen will adapt faster, retain talent longer and innovate more effectively. Companies that ignore the signs of poor productivity may remain extremely busy, but more disciplined competitors will quietly move ahead.
