
Do You Need a Glucose Monitor If You Donβt Have Diabetes?
[ad_1]
The Hype, The Science, and What Healthy People Should Know About CGMs.
Why CGMs Took Off in the βWellnessβ World
Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have exploded in popularity thanks to influencers, wellness startups, and biohacking apps. CGMs for non-diabetics are often marketed as the next-gen Fitbit for your metabolismβclaiming to unlock personalized nutrition, fat-burning potential, and real-time feedback to optimize your diet.
But hereβs the thing:Β CGMs were developed for people with diabetes, where tracking blood sugar is literally life-saving. If you donβt have diabetes, does slapping one on your arm offer any real benefitsβor just more data than you need?
What βNormalβ Blood Glucose Actually Looks Like
Normal fasting glucose levels range between 3.9-5.6 mmol/L or 70-100 mg/dL. After meals, reaching 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) is normal, as your body releases insulin to shuttle the glucose into the cells. 2 hours after eating, blood glucose should be down to under 7.8 mmol/L or 140 mg/dL

A massive study calledΒ CGMapΒ (n > 7,000 healthy adults aged 40β70) gave a detailed look at typical glucose levels in people without diabetes:
- Average 24-hour glucose: ~5.5 mmol/L (99 mg/dL)
- Time spent β₯7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL): less than 3% of the day (about 20 minutes)
- Overnight lows <3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL): rare
So yesβglucose spikes do happen, especially after eating. But these areΒ normalΒ and expected. In people with healthy metabolic function, your pancreas quickly clears that sugar and brings your levels back to baseline.
No human trial has shown that these short-lived spikes in healthy people are harmful, or that they increase the risk for disease.
Do CGMs Change Health Behaviours in Healthy People?
Letβs break down what recent human trials have discovered.
π½οΈ CGMs Donβt Change Diets Much
In a 2022 crossover study (PMID:Β 36279286), 15 healthy adults ate two isocaloric dietsβone high in refined carbs, one high in fiberβwhile wearing CGMs. Though the devices clearly detected higher spikes with the refined-carb meals, thisΒ didnβt lead to long-term dietary changes.
π Exercise Doesnβt Shift Glucose in the Way You Might Expect
In a 2023 Canadian study (PMID:Β 37562361), 27 sedentary adults wore CGMs while doing 11 minutes of daily vigorous calisthenics vs. sitting. TheΒ intervention group got fitter, but their glucose didnβt budgeβmean glucose and glycemic variability remained unchanged.
π TRE (Time-Restricted Eating) + CGMs = Minor Changes
A 2023 RCT (PMID:Β 37527388) studied overweight adultsΒ withoutΒ diabetes. Participants did time-restricted eating (eating 7amβ3pm) with a calorie deficit, compared to a calorie deficit alone.
- The TRE group hadΒ slightly smaller glucose spikesΒ (~0.3 mmol/L lower),
- But no change in weight loss or mean glucose.
π§ Most People Misinterpret CGM Data
In a 2023 survey of non-diabetic CGM users (PMID:Β 37470511), most people said they checked the data frequentlyβbut few understood it. Some evenΒ eliminated healthy carbsΒ unnecessarily.
βCGM use outside of a clinical setting may lead to inappropriate dietary restrictions and increased food anxiety.β β Study authors
Bottom line:Β CGMs arenβt driving better outcomes in people who are already metabolically healthy. They may even backfire.
Are Post-Meal Glucose Spikes Harmful?
No, and hereβs why:
- After you eat carbs, glucose naturally rises.
- Your pancreas releases insulin, which clears the sugar into your muscles and liver.
- This entire process isΒ normal,Β temporary, andΒ not harmfulΒ in healthy people.
The spike is part of the system workingΒ correctly, not failing.
Studies in healthy people show thatΒ brief post-meal glucose elevations (e.g. 120β140 mg/dL for an hour)Β areΒ not associatedΒ with inflammation, oxidative stress, or long-term metabolic damage. Attempts to flatten these small rises often lead to extreme food avoidance or anxietyβnot better health.
The Case Against Wearing a CGM Without Diabetes
| Concern | What the Science Shows |
|---|---|
| Medicalizing normal biology | 97% of CGM readings in healthy people fall within range (CGMap data). Normal spikes donβt need βfixing.β |
| Inaccuracy | Even newer CGMs (like Dexcom G7 and Libre 3) show 9β14% error rates compared to lab glucose in healthy people. |
| Skin reactions | Adhesives can cause rashes or allergic reactions (PMID:Β 31794494). |
| Data obsession | People often become overly focused on individual readings. This can fuel anxiety or orthorexia-like behaviors. |
CGMs For Non-Diabetics β Can They Help?
Possiblyβbut only in very specific cases:
- Pre-diabetes screeningΒ in high-risk individuals (family history, PCOS, obesity)
- Elite athletic performance, where precise fueling might affect endurance
- Clinical research settingsΒ studying metabolic function
But for most people,Β lifestyle factors (diet, sleep, exercise, stress)Β give you more impact than micromanaging your glucose minute-by-minute.
Conclusion: You Probably Donβt Need a CGM
If you donβt have diabetes or a diagnosed blood sugar disorder:
β
Your body handles glucose regulation on its own
β
Small spikes after eating are normal and harmless
β CGMs donβt meaningfully improve health outcomes in healthy people
β You might end up overcorrecting, over-restricting, or stressing out
Save your moneyβand spend it on fiber-rich foods, movement you enjoy, and good sleep hygiene. The simple stuff still works best.
[ad_2]
Source_link
![]()


